Movie 3

Free locomotion of groups of stage 1 and stage 3 larvae
(A) Showing a group of stage 1 larvae moving freely in the 55 mm × 55 mm test arena for 7 min (5-fold time-lapse) recorded with FIM and analysed with FIMTrack (Risse et al. 2013; Risse et al. 2014). Trajectories are blended in after 25 s. The larvae alternate between brief go and reorientation phases; most of the phase transitions lead to changes in bearing > 30° which we defined as turns (Fig. 7G). When compared to stage 3 larvae (Movie 5), the relatively smaller ‘exploration range’ in stage 1 larvae (Fig. 7H) manifests largely by differences in bending and turning behaviour (Fig. 7F, G), rather than in speed (Fig. 7E).
(B) Likewise showing a group of stage 3 larvae moving freely in the 225 mm × 225 mm test arena for 5.3 min (5-fold time-lapse) recorded with FIM and analysed with FIMTrack (Risse et al. 2013; Risse et al. 2014). Trajectories are blended in after 15 s. Similar to stage 1 larvae, also stage 3 larvae alternate between go- and reorientation phases, however relatively fewer of the phase transitions lead to changes in bearing > 30° which we defined as turns (Fig. 7G). Together with differences in bending behaviour (Fig. 7F), this results in a larger exploration range in stage 3 than in stage 1 larvae, even when normalized to body length (Fig. 7H).

The Ol1mpiad: concordance of behavioural faculties of stage 1 and stage 3 Drosophila larvae

Maria J. Almeida-Carvalho, Dimitri Berh, Andreas Braun, Yi-chun Chen, Katharina Eichler, Claire Eschbach, Pauline M. J. Fritsch, Bertram Gerber, Nina Hoyer, Xiaoyi Jiang, Jörg Kleber, Christian Klämbt, Christian König, Matthieu Louis, Birgit Michels, Anton Miroschnikow, Christen Mirth, Daisuke Miura, Thomas Niewalda, Nils Otto, Emmanouil Paisios, Michael J. Pankratz, Meike Petersen, Noel Ramsperger, Nadine Randel, Benjamin Risse, Timo Saumweber, Philipp Schlegel, Michael Schleyer, Peter Soba, Simon G. Sprecher, Teiichi Tanimura, Andreas S. Thum, Naoko Toshima, Jim W. Truman, Ayse Yarali, and Marta Zlatic

Journal of Experimental Biology 2017. 220:2452-2475; doi: 10.1242/jeb.156646